Skip to content
On this page
  1. Key Takeaways
  2. What It Is
  3. The Intuition
  4. How It Works
  5. Worked Example
  6. Common Mistakes
  7. Frequently Asked Questions
  8. Sources
  9. Disclaimer
← All concepts
Financial StatementsAdvanced5 min read

ASC 855 Subsequent Events: Which Post-Close Events Adjust the Financials

A subsequent event is something that happens between the balance sheet date and the date the financial statements are issued. ASC 855 tells companies which of those events must be recognized in the statements and which are only disclosed in the notes.

Key Takeaways

  • ASC 855 subsequent events split into two types: recognized (Type I) events reflect conditions existing at the balance sheet date and adjust the financials; non-recognized (Type II) events arose after year-end and require disclosure only.
  • For SEC filers, the evaluation period extends through the issuance date, typically 60 to 90 days after the balance sheet date, which is later than when statements are available to be issued for private entities.
  • A customer bankruptcy in February that confirms receivables were already doubtful at December 31 is a Type I event that adjusts year-end allowances; a warehouse fire in February is Type II and is disclosed but does not change December 31 balances.
  • Subsequent events that affect the going concern assessment, a post-year-end refinancing or covenant breach, must be incorporated into the ASC 205-40 evaluation, not treated as separate.

Key Takeaways

  • ASC 855 subsequent events split into two types: recognized (Type I) events reflect conditions existing at the balance sheet date and adjust the financials; non-recognized (Type II) events arose after year-end and require disclosure only.
  • For SEC filers, the evaluation period extends through the issuance date, typically 60 to 90 days after the balance sheet date, which is later than when statements are available to be issued for private entities.
  • A customer bankruptcy in February that confirms receivables were already doubtful at December 31 is a Type I event that adjusts year-end allowances; a warehouse fire in February is Type II and is disclosed but does not change December 31 balances.
  • Subsequent events that affect the going concern assessment, a post-year-end refinancing or covenant breach, must be incorporated into the ASC 205-40 evaluation, not treated as separate.

What It Is

ASC 855, Subsequent Events, distinguishes between two types of events:

  • Recognized subsequent events (also called Type I): events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date.
  • Non-recognized subsequent events (also called Type II): events that provide evidence about conditions that arose after the balance sheet date.

Recognized events adjust the amounts in the financial statements. Non-recognized events do not, but they may require disclosure if omitting them would make the statements misleading.

The Intuition

Preparing financial statements takes time. A public company typically closes its books at year end and files its 10-K 60 days later. During that window, the world keeps moving. The standard is an attempt to fold late-arriving information into the statements without letting the statements become a moving target forever.

The division between Type I and Type II events is essentially a timing test. A customer bankruptcy confirms a receivable was already doubtful at the balance sheet date, so the loss existed as of year end even if the filing came later. A fire that destroys a warehouse after year end is a new event, not a reflection of prior conditions, and therefore does not change the prior period balance sheet.

How It Works

The assessment period runs from the balance sheet date through one of two cutoffs:

SEC filer (Reg S-X): through the date the statements are issued
Non-SEC filer:       through the date the statements are available to be issued

For an SEC registrant, issued generally means when the statements are widely distributed, typically filing of the 10-K or 10-Q. For private entities, available to be issued means the statements are in final form and management has obtained all approvals needed for issuance.

Recognized (Type I) subsequent events trigger an adjustment to the financial statements themselves. Non-recognized (Type II) events do not adjust amounts, but disclosure is required when omission would render the statements misleading. The disclosure must describe the nature of the event and an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made.

Revised financial statements are required when an entity reissues statements after correcting an error. In that case, the evaluation of subsequent events extends through the reissuance date, but adjustment is limited to the error being corrected to avoid pulling in unrelated new information.

Worked Example

A retailer has a December 31 year end. The financial statements are issued on March 15.

Event A. On January 20, a large wholesale customer files for bankruptcy. The customer's financial distress was known but not yet fatal at year end. The bankruptcy is additional evidence about a condition that existed at the balance sheet date. This is a recognized subsequent event, and the December 31 receivable allowance is increased so that the reported receivable reflects the expected loss.

Event B. On February 10, a fire destroys a regional distribution center. This condition did not exist at year end. The fire is a non-recognized subsequent event. It does not change December 31 balances, but the notes disclose the fire and either quantify the loss and insurance recovery or state that an estimate cannot yet be made.

Event C. On March 5, the company signs a purchase agreement for a new subsidiary. This is a new condition arising after year end. It is non-recognized, and disclosure explains the acquisition terms, expected closing date, and estimated consideration.

Common Mistakes

  1. Choosing the wrong cutoff date. For SEC registrants, the evaluation extends through issuance, which is later than availability to issue. Using the wrong cutoff can miss events or pull in events that belong in the next period.

  2. Confusing Type I and Type II events. The test is whether conditions existed at the balance sheet date, not how unexpected the event felt when it occurred. A bankruptcy in February of a customer already 90 days past due is a Type I event even if counsel had hoped for recovery.

  3. Disclosing only material dollar amounts. Non-recognized events may require disclosure even when the financial effect is hard to quantify. A material acquisition, lawsuit, or debt issuance belongs in the notes with a description and, if possible, an estimate of financial effect.

  4. Skipping dual dating when reissuing. When statements are reissued, the audit report is dual dated to indicate the original issuance date for most items and the reissuance date for the corrected item. Skipping dual dating misrepresents the scope of the auditor's procedures.

  5. Ignoring the going concern linkage. Subsequent events can alleviate or create substantial doubt under ASC 205-40. The going concern evaluation extends through the issuance window, so a post-year-end refinancing or a covenant breach changes the disclosure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What are subsequent events in simple terms? They are material events that happen between the last day of the reporting period and the day the financial statements are officially released. Accounting rules determine whether those events should adjust the numbers in the financial statements or merely be described in the footnotes.

Q: How do subsequent events affect investment decisions? The subsequent events footnote is one of the first places an investor should look after any quarterly filing. Acquisitions signed after year-end, post-balance-sheet debt issuances, large litigation outcomes, and management changes all appear here before they are reflected in next period's financials, giving an early read on the company's trajectory.

Q: What is a real-world example of Type I vs Type II subsequent events? In the worked example, a retailer with a December 31 year end files on March 15. A customer bankruptcy in January (Type I) confirms December 31 receivables were at risk, the allowance is adjusted. A warehouse fire in February (Type II) is a new event with no December 31 condition, it is disclosed but does not change year-end balances. A March acquisition (Type II) is described with terms and estimated consideration.

Q: How can investors use subsequent events disclosures? Read the financial statement notes section headed "Subsequent Events" or "Events After the Balance Sheet Date." Also scan MD&A for forward-looking language about events that occurred after quarter end. Material post-quarter events that were not 8-K reportable sometimes surface here first.

Q: How is a subsequent event different from a contingent liability? A contingent liability is an uncertain obligation that exists at the balance sheet date, its outcome is pending but the condition is already present. A subsequent event is something that happened after the balance sheet date, it either confirms a prior condition (Type I) or creates an entirely new condition (Type II). The two overlap when a post-balance-sheet settlement resolves litigation that was a contingent liability at year end.

Sources

  1. FASB Accounting Standards Codification. "Topic 855 Subsequent Events." https://asc.fasb.org/
  2. SEC. "Regulation S-X." https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/regulation-s-x
  3. Deloitte DART. "Subsequent Events, ASC 855." https://dart.deloitte.com/USDART/home/codification/broad-transactions/asc855-10
  4. PwC Viewpoint. "Financial statement presentation." https://viewpoint.pwc.com/dt/us/en/pwc/accounting_guides/financial_statement_/financial_statement___18_US.html
  5. AICPA. "Audit and Accounting Guides." https://www.aicpa-cima.com/resources/landing/auditing-accounting-standards-and-guides

Disclaimer

This article is educational content only and is not financial advice. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.

The IWP Substack

You understand the concept. Now see it applied.

The Investing With Purpose Substack turns ideas like this into research and risk-managed trade plans on real stocks, updated every week.

Read on Substack (opens in a new tab)

Related concepts