Skip to content
On this page
  1. Key Takeaways
  2. What the Section 962 Election Is
  3. The Intuition
  4. How It Works
  5. Worked Example
  6. Common Mistakes
  7. Frequently Asked Questions
  8. Sources
  9. Disclaimer
← All concepts
Tax & AccountsAdvanced5 min read

Section 962 Election: Corporate Rates for Owners

A Section 962 election lets an individual who is a U.S. shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation choose to be taxed on certain foreign inclusions at corporate rates instead of individual rates. The election also opens the door to the deemed-paid foreign tax credit that is normally reserved for corporate shareholders.

Key Takeaways

  • A Section 962 election lets an individual pay corporate rates on Subpart F and GILTI inclusions.
  • It allows the deemed-paid foreign tax credit individuals otherwise cannot claim.
  • A common error is forgetting the second layer of tax when the earnings are later distributed.
  • It is most useful when the CFC paid substantial foreign tax on the included income.

Key Takeaways

  • A Section 962 election lets an individual pay corporate rates on Subpart F and GILTI inclusions.
  • It allows the deemed-paid foreign tax credit individuals otherwise cannot claim.
  • A common error is forgetting the second layer of tax when the earnings are later distributed.
  • It is most useful when the CFC paid substantial foreign tax on the included income.

What the Section 962 Election Is

The Section 962 election is set out in Internal Revenue Code section 962. It allows an individual U.S. shareholder of a CFC to elect, year by year, to have amounts included under section 951(a), which covers Subpart F income and GILTI, taxed as if a domestic corporation had received them.

Two benefits come with the election. The included income is taxed at the corporate rate of 21 percent rather than the individual's higher marginal rate. And the individual may claim the deemed-paid foreign tax credit under the corporate rules, treating the foreign taxes the CFC paid as if the individual had paid them. Without the election, an individual cannot claim that credit and may face GILTI without the section 250 deduction.

The Intuition

GILTI and Subpart F were designed around corporate shareholders. A corporation gets a partial deduction and a credit for foreign taxes the CFC paid. An individual gets neither by default, so the same foreign income can be taxed far more heavily in individual hands.

Section 962 lets the individual borrow the corporate treatment for the inclusion. The trade-off is a second layer of tax later. The election treats the income as if it passed through a corporation, so when the actual cash is distributed, the part above the U.S. tax already paid is taxed again as a dividend.

How It Works

The individual makes the election on the tax return for the year and recomputes the inclusion under corporate rules, often using Form 1118 to claim the deemed-paid credit.

Step 1   Elect under section 962 for the year
Step 2   Tax the 951(a) inclusion at the 21% corporate rate
Step 3   Claim section 250 deduction (for GILTI) and deemed-paid FTC
Step 4   On later distribution, tax the excess over U.S. tax paid as a dividend

The election covers all of the individual's CFC inclusions for that year and must be renewed annually. Under the regulations, the corporate-rate tax is a floor, and the individual still owes regular tax on later distributions to the extent the cash exceeds the tax already paid under the election. That second layer is what makes the election a timing and credit play rather than a permanent rate cut.

Worked Example

Suppose an individual has a 1,000,000 dollar GILTI inclusion from a CFC that paid 150,000 dollars of foreign tax on the underlying income.

Without 962  = 1,000,000 taxed at ~37% individual rate = 370,000, no FTC
With 962     = section 250 deduction, taxed at 21% corporate rate
With 962     = ~ (1,000,000 deduction-adjusted) x 21% minus deemed-paid FTC
Foreign tax credit (deemed-paid) offsets much of the U.S. tax
Later: distribution above U.S. tax paid is taxed again as a dividend

When the CFC paid meaningful foreign tax, the election can sharply cut the current U.S. tax, even after accounting for the future second layer. When foreign tax is low, the benefit shrinks.

Common Mistakes

  1. Forgetting the second layer. The election does not erase tax on the cash. Later distributions above the U.S. tax already paid are taxed again as dividends.

  2. Electing without foreign tax. The biggest benefit is the deemed-paid credit. With little foreign tax, the election may save little.

  3. Treating it as permanent. The election applies for one year and must be remade. Assuming it carries forward is an error.

  4. Overlooking the section 250 deduction. For GILTI, the election lets an individual claim the corporate deduction. Missing it overstates the tax.

  5. Ignoring state tax. Some states do not follow the federal election, so the corporate-rate benefit may not apply at the state level.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Section 962 election in simple terms? A Section 962 election lets an individual who owns a foreign company pay tax on its foreign income at the lower corporate rate and use credits for foreign taxes the company paid. It is a yearly choice.

How does a Section 962 election affect investment decisions? For an individual holding a controlled foreign corporation, the election can cut the current U.S. tax on GILTI and Subpart F income, which influences whether to hold a CFC directly or through a U.S. company. The worked example shows the benefit depends on foreign tax paid.

What is a real-world example of a Section 962 election? An individual with a 1,000,000 dollar GILTI inclusion from a CFC that paid 150,000 dollars of foreign tax can elect corporate-rate treatment, claim the deemed-paid credit, and lower the current U.S. tax sharply.

How can investors use a Section 962 election effectively? Run the numbers both ways each year, focus on years with high foreign tax, and plan for the second layer of tax when earnings are distributed. A cross-border tax adviser can confirm whether the election beats holding through a corporation.

How is a Section 962 election different from holding a CFC through a U.S. corporation? The election gives an individual corporate-rate treatment for one year without forming an entity, while an actual U.S. holding corporation provides ongoing corporate treatment but adds entity-level compliance and its own distribution tax.

Sources

  1. Cornell Legal Information Institute. "26 U.S.C. 962 - Election by individuals to be subject to tax at corporate rates." https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/962
  2. Cornell Legal Information Institute. "26 U.S.C. 951A - Net CFC tested income included in gross income of United States shareholders." https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/951A
  3. Cornell Legal Information Institute. "26 CFR 1.962-1 - Limitation of tax for individuals on amounts included in gross income under section 951(a)." https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.962-1
  4. IRS. "About Form 1118, Foreign Tax Credit - Corporations." https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-1118

Disclaimer

This article is educational content only and is not financial advice. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.

The IWP Substack

You understand the concept. Now see it applied.

The Investing With Purpose Substack turns ideas like this into research and risk-managed trade plans on real stocks, updated every week.

Read on Substack (opens in a new tab)

Related concepts